🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart atomic talks with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to restart discussions with the US government. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is walking a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been destroyed. Afterward, European countries exercised their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Status

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations restart.

The American leader recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the conference, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the strikes started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust hard to restore.

Negotiations Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had consistently sought to dictate their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be viable and continues the ultimate resolution to settle conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the identical tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the face of this invasion."